![]() ![]() Granted when people feel like they could just buy one of something, and they can't they'll think the system should change. Or you want to go out to eat, you need two whole meals, can you believe that? Two movie tickets? What madness will they think of next? Or if you want to go hunting, you kinda need two sets of everything. I mean if you want to ride bikes with your son you have to get two. I'm not sure why people think buying two of something is such a travesty. But it's quite clear that you give a user a mile and they'll take a whole AU. And someone might say GoG, but if you read their terms carefully, no DRM isn't a license to do whatever you want with the game. You might find that other platforms aren't really less restrictive. Maybe you should use all the other platforms that allow multiple users to play multiple games off a single account at the same time. Which no matter what story you tell yourself it would be, even without whatever arbitrary limits you'd. And I agree fewer games would be available for family sharing if you make it a free-for-all. And as Chopman mentions it's an optional features developers can opt out of. But people always want to demand features that will enable them to buy fewer games. Originally posted by Snakub Plissken:Users always want things and they're not interested in the needs of other parties, or the need to compromise.įamily Sharing is not a way to avoid buying games. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |